The
anxiety of guilt and condemnation responds to the question, “What have you made
of yourself?” The individual is both the
questioner and the questioned. Tillich
says this situation
In
some sense you are like one standing or approaching the peripheries of the end
of a journey and taking stock. To this
question, one either responds, “Nothing” or “Something.” And the “Something/Nothing” dichotomy is often
determined relative to the norms of the environmental context in which it is
made. In the corporate world all I ever
heard was production, tons, bottom-line, objectives and many other measurements
of success. You have achieved something
if you measure up to the icons established and determined by your
environment. Everybody heard those voices,
and they determined your remuneration in a bottomless pit that never filled. It was not what most people wanted to do but
it was the only voices we heard and measured by. Nobody said you would never join the ‘Billionaires
Club’ if you kept listening to those voices.
Nobody said anything about intuition; that voice that guides you to do
what you want to do and are passionate about.
That
question is determined in the context of our finitude. We do not have forever to actualize. Being human also implies accepting the
reality of our finiteness. We are free
to actualize to our highest possible and yet that freedom can only be pursued
within the limitations of our liberty.
If we act in accordance with what we believe to be the demands of
destiny we are affirmed but nonbeing continues to undermine every action every
step of the way, even the best of our performance.
As
in ontic and spiritual self-affirmation, death ultimately stands in the
background of whether we succeed in making something or nothing of ourselves
(moral self-affirmation).
In
the Genesis narrative, Adam and Eve were given authority over all creation but
their liberty was limited. They were not
to eat of “the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.” Anxiety is introduced when we choose to
explore beyond the liberties we are given in the divine scheme of things.
There
is a problem!
Tillich’s
Despair suggest the surrender of being to nonbeing. The awareness of that suggestion adds another
element to despair which Tillich calls “despair within despair.” It is one’s awareness of surrender and the
inevitable and ultimate prospects of absolute surrender
Despair
hits the ceiling, and it cannot see its way into the future. What do you do if you cannot see your way
into the future? A lot of people have
been there; like the financier who jumps off the highest skyscraper
because his/her investments were wiped out overnight. Joseph Goebbels and his wife poisoned their
six children and committed suicide because they could not imagine life without
the Fuhrer
A
psychiatric observation to this effect was made by Frankl when writing about
the situation in the Nazi death camps
'The
prisoner who had lost faith in the future—his future—his faith was doomed. With his loss of belief in the future, he
lost his spiritual hold; he let himself decline and became subject to mental
and physical decay.'
Tillich’s
analysis of anxiety leaves us with a feeling of doom and gloom. That is typical of all existentialism and that
mood has been decried from philosophical, psychological, and theological
directions. Yet Tillich is presenting
two sides of the same coin. The one side
(nonbeing) is perennially feeding on the other (being). In the thought of Tillich being has a priority
over nonbeing yet nonbeing relentlessly seeks to undermine being. Nonbeing has no life of its own because it
feeds on the life of being. If being did
not exist, then nonbeing would be a hollow misnomer. Being is something and nonbeing is nothing.
How
is this priority of being over nonbeing a leverage in dealing with human
anxiety? Tillich argues that whole point
convincingly in his comparison of existential and pathological anxiety. The fact that there is a dark side to human
existence means that there is a bright side.
Self-affirmation is not a denial of nonbeing, in it being takes the
parasitical nature of the nothingness of nonbeing into itself. Nonbeing would be nothing if being was not
something. The courage of being to
withstand the forces of nonbeing must take that reality into consideration. Unlike some panaceas to pathological anxiety which seem to suggest the possibility of an emotional or existential equilibrium or
elimination
For
the pathological neurotic, self-affirmation is available but only in a limited
sense. The neurotic is affirmed but is
surrendered to the things they fear. A
reappearance of their fears—if they have been removed—may drive them into
despair. The neurotic is partially affirmed because he/she finds affirmation in
the denial of being’s relation to nonbeing
For
Tillich, these pathological attempts in the medical and social sciences do not
go far enough. The solutions are often
shallow because they ignore the ontic structure of anxiety. They treat the symptoms and leave the
sickness intact. In this way the problem is not solved because it usually will
resurface in another form and another place and will finally result in
emotional exhaustion and finally despair.
No comments:
Post a Comment